Context is extremely important in everyday life as it provides us with the underlying reason for the idea. Without context, we would often be confused during a conversation as there would be plenty of missing information and questions raised. For example, if I were having a conversation about the weather with a person and left out the location (or the context), they would be very confused as to what city I was referring to. We learned this week that providing context in mathematics is extremely important to "hook" the students and answer the age old question of "why do we need to learn this?"
To begin, we looked at several open-ended problems in class and we attempted to tackle them in groups of four. One of these examples we looked at was determining the number of possible toppings on a Harvey's burger if there was a total of 2048 combinations. If this was a data management class, this would be a great introduction into combinations and permutations as it really catches the student's attention and gets them thinking. Our group attempted to figure out the total combinations if there were one, two and three toppings and then tried to find a recursive formula using a table of values. This was a good idea, but it was pretty time consuming as we had to make sure were weren't leaving out any possible combinations. After this activity, we discussed the results as a group and found out that everybody tackled the problem differently but still achieved a similar answer of 11 toppings. The context of this problem makes it a lot more applicable to everyday life compared to a boring old "black and white" textbook question. I feel that providing context is important to keep the class engaged as well as provide an answer to "why do we need to learn this?" In the Harvey's example, we actually touched upon Combinations and Pascal's Triangle which are both important topics in data management and statistics. Essentially, even though we were trying to figure out the answer using a variety of creative ideas and methods we still brushed upon important mathematical concepts that are essential for the statistics unit.
In relation to our class as future educators it can be seen that context can increase overall engagement in the subject and enhance critical thinking skills especially with open-ended problems. The video attached to this blog shows a teacher describing her experience with cultural context being applied to fractions. She states that her class is very much involved with sports and she feels that adding a context to fractions will help them understand greater. She sets up her fractions with a basketball context and relates the shots made over the total shots taken. For example, if a player made 7 shots out of a possible 10 in one game then they would have a field goal percentage of 7/10 or 70%. She then moves into the process of solving proportions and cross multiplications all while still using the same context. I believe that this is a really creative idea to use as students can use real NBA or WNBA player statistics while still understanding fractions clearly. The students can then answer the question as to "why" themselves as now when watching basketball they can apply their fraction knowledge to real life NBA or WNBA statistics.
Monday, 31 October 2016
Tuesday, 25 October 2016
Smartboard: Hit or Miss?
This week in class, we looked at the importance of technology within the mathematics classroom. Education has greatly changed over the past 20 or so years with the use of technology. When I was in school, the only technology we had was about 10 computers and a few televisions. In today's integrated classroom, technology can be used everywhere from online games to iPads which enhance the learning of students and engages the class as a whole.
Although there are so many technological tools to enhance learning, we as future teachers need to make sure we are using it appropriately and effectively in the classroom. Often times, we can overuse technology to the point where it seems repetitive and uninteresting to the students. An example of this that we discussed in class was the idea of smartboards. When these first came to the teaching profession, there was a large push for them as they were marketed to replace the boring chalkboards with an innovative and interactive learning tool. Basically, smartboards are essentially a touchscreen whiteboard computer that students and teachers can write on, move objects around and point and click with the touch of their fingers. Smarttech.com states that it is a complete "learning system that combines award-winning technologies to produce an interactive whiteboard". Seems pretty innovative as clearly you could integrate this in a lot of lessons but we have to remember that these smartboards are not cheap! In fact, according to smarttech.com, these whiteboards range from $3000-$4000 dollars. Many classes both in highschool and elementary school do have at least one smartboard in the room which means a good portion of the school's money has already been spent on these boards. This would be fine if the smartboards received great praise for being an extremely innovative tool however many educators feel that it just really isn't worth the investment. In fact, Lisa Nielsen a teacher in the United States suggests that smartboards don't change the model that's broken they just make that model way more expensive (http://theinnovativeeducator.blogspot.ca/2010/05/why-smartboards-are-dumb-initiative.html). Essentially, she feels that even with a smartboard the teacher still controls the content, stands in front of the classroom and has to manage a bunch of kids through a lesson plan they'd rather not be managed through. She feels that a lot of teachers are using the smartboards to teach traditional lessons because they do not have the required training to fully unleash the capabilities of the smartboard. I myself do agree with this statement as I too have witnessed a teacher using the smartboard as a basic whiteboard. While I was doing an observation placement on the first day, the teacher was telling me all about the new smartboards in the classroom. When I went to observe his lessons all he did was put a powerpoint on the smartboard, stand at the front and talk for 40 minutes and barley use any of the vast capabilities of the smartboard. Judging from the reactions of the students around me I could tell that the lesson got very dull quick even though he used the smartboard.
Overall, I feel that smartboards can be an extremely useful tool because it has so many capabilities. But, for the price I feel that every teacher should be trained on how to harness these capabilities and create a creative and fun learning environment for the students. I have posted a link below which shows some cool things you can do on a smartboard. Let me know what you think, are they innovative ideas or not so innovative?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0IGg0UaN3Y
Although there are so many technological tools to enhance learning, we as future teachers need to make sure we are using it appropriately and effectively in the classroom. Often times, we can overuse technology to the point where it seems repetitive and uninteresting to the students. An example of this that we discussed in class was the idea of smartboards. When these first came to the teaching profession, there was a large push for them as they were marketed to replace the boring chalkboards with an innovative and interactive learning tool. Basically, smartboards are essentially a touchscreen whiteboard computer that students and teachers can write on, move objects around and point and click with the touch of their fingers. Smarttech.com states that it is a complete "learning system that combines award-winning technologies to produce an interactive whiteboard". Seems pretty innovative as clearly you could integrate this in a lot of lessons but we have to remember that these smartboards are not cheap! In fact, according to smarttech.com, these whiteboards range from $3000-$4000 dollars. Many classes both in highschool and elementary school do have at least one smartboard in the room which means a good portion of the school's money has already been spent on these boards. This would be fine if the smartboards received great praise for being an extremely innovative tool however many educators feel that it just really isn't worth the investment. In fact, Lisa Nielsen a teacher in the United States suggests that smartboards don't change the model that's broken they just make that model way more expensive (http://theinnovativeeducator.blogspot.ca/2010/05/why-smartboards-are-dumb-initiative.html). Essentially, she feels that even with a smartboard the teacher still controls the content, stands in front of the classroom and has to manage a bunch of kids through a lesson plan they'd rather not be managed through. She feels that a lot of teachers are using the smartboards to teach traditional lessons because they do not have the required training to fully unleash the capabilities of the smartboard. I myself do agree with this statement as I too have witnessed a teacher using the smartboard as a basic whiteboard. While I was doing an observation placement on the first day, the teacher was telling me all about the new smartboards in the classroom. When I went to observe his lessons all he did was put a powerpoint on the smartboard, stand at the front and talk for 40 minutes and barley use any of the vast capabilities of the smartboard. Judging from the reactions of the students around me I could tell that the lesson got very dull quick even though he used the smartboard.
Overall, I feel that smartboards can be an extremely useful tool because it has so many capabilities. But, for the price I feel that every teacher should be trained on how to harness these capabilities and create a creative and fun learning environment for the students. I have posted a link below which shows some cool things you can do on a smartboard. Let me know what you think, are they innovative ideas or not so innovative?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0IGg0UaN3Y
Monday, 17 October 2016
Engaging Diagnostic Assessments
This week in class, we learned
about the term diagnostic assessment.
Essentially, this can be defined as an assessment that provides
educators with information about each student’s prior knowledge before
beginning instruction (smarttutor.com). Usually, the best time to implement this type
of assessment is at the beginning of a lesson or unit. The assessment essentially tells the teacher
where the students are at in terms of their prior knowledge and any potential
gaps or barriers that might be in the way.
Often times especially in math, having the foundations are essential to
understanding greater mathematical concepts as they build on each other. For example, to understand collecting “Like
Terms” in algebra you must know the basics of BEDMAS as it is important for
achieving the correct answer.
There
could be several reasons why a teacher wants to conduct a diagnostic
assessment. First, often when students
come back from the summer break into a new grade, it is important to find out
where every student is at in terms of their mathematical level. This will help the lesson planning process be
a lot smoother if you can gauge where your students are at. Usually, at the beginning of the school year a teacher will conduct a diagnostic assessment over the first few days of class. Using this information, they can review or
change certain topics in their lessons to provide a better learning experience in the future.
There
are several different types of diagnostic assessments that can be used in the
classroom. Often times, there is a
worksheet or quiz covering last year's material that is handed out which acts a refresher
for the students Although this is a good idea, there are much
more interactive diagnostic assessments to get students excited for the
upcoming math year. One idea that was discussed was
the idea of using an online application called Kahoot. Essentially, this application works by the
teacher inputting several questions of their choosing and four multiple choice
answers. When they create a game,
students are able to connect to it by using their phones, tablets, laptops etc.
and instantly join and play. They are awarded points based
on whether their question is right and how fast they answer. It is an extremely interactive game and would
be a great diagnostic tool as the teacher can review the results after the
session. I have provided a quick link to video
on how the game Kahoot works. Check it out ! I highly recommend it
In conclusion, diagnostic assessments is a great tool to get an understanding of students previous knowledge. This becomes very important at the beginning of new units or even the first day of class as it allows the teacher to gauge where their class is at. Using interactive diagnostic assessments such as kahoot keeps the classroom fun and engaging for the students as well as provides the teacher with appropriate feedback.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFFv6_6was4
In conclusion, diagnostic assessments is a great tool to get an understanding of students previous knowledge. This becomes very important at the beginning of new units or even the first day of class as it allows the teacher to gauge where their class is at. Using interactive diagnostic assessments such as kahoot keeps the classroom fun and engaging for the students as well as provides the teacher with appropriate feedback.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pFFv6_6was4
Sunday, 2 October 2016
Differentiating Learning (Instruction)
Differentiating
Learning is an essential idea that must be implemented into lesson and unit
plans in order to create an effect learning space. Differentiating
Learning or (DI) can be defined as “Differentiation
means tailoring instruction to meet individual needs. Whether teachers
differentiate content, process, products, or the learning environment, the use
of ongoing assessment and flexible grouping makes this a successful approach to
instruction”( http://www.readingrockets.org/article/what-differentiated-instruction).
Basically DI is important as every
student learns at their own pace, style etc. and by tailoring lessons we can
reach every student’s individual needs.
In class we observed
three different scenarios that related to differentiating instruction. We then had to analyse the scenario and
identify areas of formative assessment and differentiated instruction. Each scenario was unique but they all based
around one teacher and a math class.
Some of the ways they were able to differentiate the lesson was having
students use electronic resources such as an online game called “CLIP”. Here, each student can use this online tool
to meet their specific needs. For
example, a student who is strong and confident in math is able to complete the
lessons at perhaps a faster pace or at a slightly higher difficulty. Moreover, a student who perhaps came from a different educational background can understand their lesson at their own pace that feels
comfortable to them. This eliminates
confusion and poor student engagement in the classroom as students individual
needs will be met which is not always what happens in a traditional education
lesson.
In observing the picture above, it
can be seen that there are many different types of students in a classroom and obviously not all of them learn in the same manner.
This is why differentiated instruction is important to attempt to meet
individual needs. For example, a student
who perhaps just immigrated to Canada may not have English as their first
language. This means that in a math class, not only do they have to learn the math material as everybody else they
also have to try and understand it with their second language. This can become extremely hard for the
student as they would have to learn the language and material at the same time . Moreover, this may lead to them falling
behind and feeling overwhelmed in the classroom. I know there are math lessons and activities online
that you are able to change the default language which could make learning math
easier to the student in the example. I think this would be a great idea for students that may have different language abilities. I often look at myself and think how hard
it would be for me to learn math in another language as it can be a difficult
subject at times. Differentiated
learning is critical to the lesson planning process as it could help students with different needs,
backgrounds, language abilities, cultures etc. learn the subject in their own
style and pace.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)