Throughout the third week of class, we focused on making two
concepts in math become more visual to the students. These two concepts can often be tricky to
learn in math especially when it is taught using traditional schooling
methods. I believe like most subjects
that math should not just be taught from the textbook. Often times the textbook leaves out
information that leads to poor understanding from the students. Essentially, the textbooks often try to “make
concepts easier” by using different language or situations but this usually
results in confusion when students attempt to read the question. Looking at the picture below, I am still very
confused as to what the question is asking and this is from a grade 5 math
textbook. I was reading an article
written by Gina Cassini found here http://toprightnews.com/priceless-student-sums-common-core-math-idiocy-single-word/
and I believe it truly sums up the downside to overcomplicating mathematics Essentially, this style of learning has been put into
place in many math textbooks to try and look at another approach of solving the
problem. This is a great idea in theory
but it is not always a plausible method of looking at a problem. I believe that something like arithmetic which is vital in
mathematics should not be over complicated to the point of extreme confusion.
Now I am not saying that we shouldn’t be looking at mathematics (specifically arithmetic) through
multiple perspectives. I am saying that
if one way at looking a problem makes you scratch your head 10 times over than
perhaps that is not an effect way for students to learn. This is why if you are trying to teach a lesson from a different perspective than the "norm" that it is important that this lesson is still clear to the students. Often times this can be achieved by reading over your lesson plan to make sure it even makes sense as clearly whoever wrote this question must've not checked their plan.
I
believe that a solution to the textbooks is visualizing mathematics. In class we used a variety of methods to
visualize patterns and algebra. Each
student in the class made their own patterns and displayed a picture of it on
the projector. This allowed us to
individually go through each of our pattern creations and work together to try
and solve the recursive formula. I
believe that interact visual methods such as these are beneficial to improving
learning as these combine student’s imagination with learning. You would be quite surprised to see what some
students might come up with in their pattern.
Moreover, we used algebra tiles that make learning the dreaded concept
of “algebra” seem less threatening. I
similarly thought that using these was an interactive method that could be
applied to a variety of problems including: factoring, completing the square, expanding binomials
etc. Overall, I am excited to see what
we are going to learn next week in class as this class really makes me observe mathematics with a critical lens.
I find it interesting how you are thinking about how textbooks represent mathematics and connecting it to our discussion about models. I actually follow the explanation in the image reasonably well but perhaps that is because I have spent some time working with my elementary colleagues on early learning of mathematics. I'm wondering if you can think about how a textbook could use a visual to help make that explanation clearer and why they would suggest that approach to adding in the first place.
ReplyDeleteHi Mike,
ReplyDeleteI found your take on textbook language very interesting and how it can often confuse students when they are trying to answer certain questions. Visualizing mathematics is definitely a great solution to the tricky textbook language but may not work for all of the learners within our classrooms! I also like your idea on how using visuals can make a concept less frightening to students and help build their motivation, which is very important in any subject if a student is struggling.
Thanks for an interesting perspective!